| Item type |
文献 / Documents(1) |
| 公開日 |
2011-12-07 |
| アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
| 資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
| 出版社版DOI |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.58.175 |
|
|
言語 |
ja |
|
|
関連名称 |
10.2152/jmi.58.175 |
| 出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Using the MDCT thick slab MinIP method for the follow-up of pulmonary emphysema |
|
言語 |
en |
| 著者 |
Lan, Hai
西谷, 弘
西原, 貞光
上野, 淳二
髙尾, 正一郎
岩本, 誠司
川中, 崇
Mahmut, Mawlan
Qingge, Si
|
| 抄録 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
Abstract : Purpose : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of thick slabminimum intensity projection (MinIP) as a follow-up method in patients with pulmonaryemphysema. This method was used to determine the presence or absence of changes overtime in the lung field based on multi-detector-row CT (MDCT) data. Methods : Among patientsdiagnosed with pulmonary emphysema who underwent 16-MDCT (slice thickness,1 mm) twice at an interval of 6 months or more, 12 patients without changes in the lungfield and 14 with clear changes in the lung field were selected as subjects. An image interpretationexperiment was performed by five image interpreters. Pulmonary emphysemawas followed up using two types of thick slab MinIP (thick slab MinIP 1 and 2) andmulti-planar reformation (MPR), and the results of image interpretation were evaluatedby receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, the time required forimage interpretation was compared among the three follow-up methods. Results : Thearea under the ROC curve (Az) was 0.794 for thick slab MinIP 1, 0.778 for the thick slabMinIP 2, and 0.759 for MPR, showing no significant differences among the three methods.Individual differences in each item were significantly more marked for MPR thanfor thick slab MinIP. The time required for image interpretation was around 18 secondsfor thick slab MinIP 1, 11 seconds for thick slab MinIP 2, and approximately 127 secondsfor MPR, showing significant differences among the three methods. Conclusion : Therewere no significant differences in the results of image interpretation regarding the presenceor absence of changes in the lung fields between thick slab MinIP and MPR. However,thick slab MinIP showed a shorter image interpretation time and smaller individualdifferences in the results among image interpreters than MPR, suggesting the usefulnessof this method for determining the presence or absence of changes with time in the lungfields of patients with pulmonary emphysema. |
|
言語 |
en |
| キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
pulmonary emphysema |
| キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
MDCT |
| キーワード |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
MinIP |
| 書誌情報 |
en : The journal of medical investigation : JMI
巻 58,
号 3-4,
p. 175-179,
発行日 2011
|
| 収録物ID |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
13431420 |
| 収録物ID |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AA11166929 |
| 備考 |
|
|
言語 |
ja |
|
値 |
The journal of medical investigation : http://medical.med.tokushima-u.ac.jp/jmi/index.html |
| EID |
|
|
識別子 |
244930 |
|
識別子タイプ |
URI |
| 言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
LID201112071002.pdf (485 KB)
