ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

  • RootNode

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学内刊行物
  2. 言語文化研究
  3. 30
  1. 資料タイプ別
  2. 紀要論文

Zur Theorie des filmischen Raums (Teil 1)

https://tokushima-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2010675
https://tokushima-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2010675
c6221e2a-65c1-4312-a63f-1ded4f76476d
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
jll_30_2.pdf jll_30_2.pdf (347 KB)
Item type 文献 / Documents(1)
公開日 2022-12-23
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
タイトル
タイトル Zur Theorie des filmischen Raums (Teil 1)
著者 シートゲス, オラフ

× シートゲス, オラフ

WEKO 778
徳島大学 教育研究者総覧 292991/profile-ja.html

ja シートゲス, オラフ
ISNI

ja-Kana シートゲス, オラフ

en Schiedges, Olaf

Search repository
抄録
内容記述 This article is the first part of a two-part text that aims to introduce film theorists who attempted to make the phenomena of cinematic space theoretically comprehensible. Hugo Münsterberg (1863-1916), Erwin Panofsky (1892-1968) and Vsevolod Pudovkin (1893-1953) were theorists who have experienced the spread of film from the beginning and have dealt with the significance of film for culture and society. The means of montage was of particular interest in early theoretical considerations because it had been recognised that the filmmaker can manipulate space and time by means of montage. Bela Balazs (1884-1949) was concerned with recognising film as popular art that creates culture which, in his view, permeates reality and contributes to the emergence of a visual culture. Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) believed that the social significance of film lies in a change in collective perception. Rudolph Arnheim (1904-2007) was interested in phenomena such as surface and depth, which he viewed from the perspective of Gestalt psychology. He emphasised the spatial autonomy of film compared to theatre, which would only be maintained as long as film did not attempt to create a second real space. For Siegfried Kracauer (1889-1966), film was always a special form of reality, which is why he was concerned with the representation of physical reality through the cinematic medium, as well as with the question of what attributes ultimately constitute a film. The article ends with a look at André Bazin's (1918-1958) understanding of cinematic space. For Bazin, who regarded the deformation of space as a fundamental characteristic of film realism, characters, objects, and events are always parts of the cinematic space. One can banish every reality from the film image, Bazin stated, except one: that of space.
書誌情報 ja : 言語文化研究
en : Journal of Language and Literature

巻 30, p. 13-54, 発行日 2022-12
収録物ID
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2433345X
収録物ID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA12844300
出版者
出版者 徳島大学総合科学部
EID
識別子 398491
言語
言語 deu
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2024-12-12 09:07:57.475711
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3